What evidence that marilyn monroe did not kill herself Research Paper

What evidence that marilyn monroe did not kill herself - Research Paper Example In this paper, I would look into every aspect and clue which could take us to a point, whether Marilyn died accidently, was it an intentional suicide attempt? Or was it a planned plot against her? Marilyn’s death is an unsolved mystery and it is still the most debatable conspiracy theory. She died on August 5th, 1962 at the age of 36 and was found dead in her bedroom by her psychoanalyst consultant doctor, Ralph. S. Greenson who was being called by her caretaker Eunice Murray. She got married thrice in her life but wasn’t able to keep her relations for long. She first got married to James Dougherty in 1942 which lasted for four years only; second marriage with Joe DiMaggio, the famous football player lasted for nine months and her third marriage with a play writer Arthur Miller ended up in five years. There are several reasons for which this death is still not digestible for many people. Marilyn was addicted to sleeping pills and was mentally disturbed and therefore she had two consultant doctors, Doctor Ralph Greenson and Doctor Hyman Engelberg. Her death report showed that she died of acute barbiturate poisoning which was either taken purposely for a suicide attempt or was intentionally given to murder her for a reason. However no murder charges were made. Dr. Thomas Noguchi look at this death as an uncertain suicide because as a pathologist, he did not find any residue in Marilyn stomach if such high dose would have been taken orally, there had to be a residue in her stomach or any evidence in blood. Moreover her toxicology report showed that her organs were completely damaged and there was a presence of Nembutal and chloral hydrate in extreme level which could kill ten people. There were no signs of intravenous injections however suppository could have been used to transfer t his amount in her body (Morgolis,

12 Angry men Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

12 Angry men - Essay Example The courthouse of which the movie was filmed was filled with 12 men all who seem to be of the same race and of the same general age. It seems that the only difference between the jurors are their social and economic backgrounds which the movie had illustrated on it could influence a person’s mindset and judgment. For example, Juror 5 shared the â€Å"slum upbringing â€Å" as the young boy being charged, that allowed him to relate to his living conditions but other juror like Juror 4 seemed to judge the boy harshly based on where he was raised. Juror 4 even as far to say†¦ â€Å" If you live in slum you become slum†. These statements indicates the biases of the jurors due to their backgrounds that reflect in their faulty reasoning as well as their erroneous judgment. When these prior biases and prejudices were overcome however, the jury begins to realize the error in their reasoning that finally led them to vote for non-conviction of the boy. They are many reasoning and thinking errors in film. Some of the thinking errors identified in the movie, â€Å"12 angry men† was being closed-minded, being prejudice and being impatient. We identify these as thinking errors because it demonstrates how our faulty judgment just like the case of the jurors are influenced by their background to erroneously judge the case of the boy. As an example of the thinking error of being impatient was when one of the jurors does not want to engage in a lengthy discussion about the case for fear of running late for the baseball game. Another thinking error in the film was being closed-minded and prejudice. This was shown in the case of Juror 3 whose estranged relationship with his son affected his judgment in the case of wanting to convict the suspect just because of his strained relationship with his son. Another is juror 10 who is prejudiced against the slums dwellers as killers and people